Nonprofit Harvest

Minnesota’s Current Conditions

On the heels of last week’s post on the Giving USA annual study, we have more data to digest. MCN recently released their Current Conditions Report for June 2009:

Minnesota’s nonprofits continue to be seriously affected by the recession. Nonprofits are bracing for extended impacts from the reduction in revenue they have already seen and expect to continue to see in the coming months and years.

• Organizations relying on state, local or federal government are seeing varying levels of unreliability in payments to them from government, making it increasingly difficult for organizations to plan accordingly. Exacerbating this is the threat of unallotment for many organizations.
• A majority of organizations report an increase in demand for services, yet many are still having to cut back on staff.
• All major nonprofit revenue sources (contributions, government funding, foundation grants, and earned income) are reported to be down from economic affects.
• Small organizations are feeling the worst affects, with far more reporting declines in revenue and cash shortfalls. Small organizations are also the least likely to have available reserves or a line of credit to fall back on.

These findings are echoed by other studies (here and here).  Although the specifics vary from state to state, and among organization type and size, people in our sector are doing their best to meet demands with fewer resources.

We are all trying to prudently cut costs in ways that minimize the impact on our mission and overall capacity. This is a tall order, especially when combined with increasing needs for service. How do you go about making those tough choices?

A Four Step Framework

Our executive director, Kate Barr and Judy Alnes of MAP for Nonprofits wrote an article for MCF’s Winter Giving Forum, Nonprofit Survival: Four Steps to Take Now:

Economic uncertainty and the threat of impending doom are not unfamiliar territory for nonprofit organizations. We’ve lived through multiple downturns and have “right-sized” ourselves time and time again. Philanthropic organizations have done likewise.

But something feels uncharted about this downturn. Perhaps it’s the fact that it has fallen on the heels of a downturn from which we never really recovered. Perhaps the global nature of the economic stress makes us see ourselves in a broader context. In any event, this fire is real and hot.

Then they lay out four steps to help you make decisions:

• Focus
• Identify Your Most Important Work
• Seek and Speak Financial Truth
• Review Size, Scope and Structure

Read the rest of the article for more information on this helpful framework.

Other Resources

• Improving Cash Flow Management In Challenging Times: A Primer from Nonprofit Quarterly
• Our Cash Flow Template and Nonprofit Scenario Planning Tools
• Nonprofit Layoffs and Furloughs: Do Them Right from Blue Avocado

More resources are available at Sustenance in Lean Times, our resource collection.

This Week’s Harvest

• Governor’s Unallotment Plan
• Check out the Nonprofit Quarterly’s Daily Digest - the Nonprofit Newswire
• Strategies for Hard Times: The Case for Sustainable Funding
• Charities Review Council unveiled a draft of their updated Accountability Standards
• Recession Resources for Artists and Arts Organizations

Charitable Giving: Glass Half Empty or Hall Full?

This week, Giving USA released their report on 2008 giving.  As nonprofits can attest, it was a rough year.  According to the study, total giving decreased by 5.7%, with donations down across the board.

• Individual giving: -6.3 percent
• Foundation grantmaking: -0.8 percent
• Corporate giving: -8 percent
• Charitable bequests: -6.4 percent
• Two-thirds of public charities experienced a decline in donations.

However, even in the worst economic climate since the Great Depression, charitable giving exceeded $300 billion.

Over at Tactical Philanthropy, Sean does some excellent analysis in his post How Much Did Americans Really Give in 2008?

So what’s the take away? I would say that the best way to think about charitable giving in 2008 is that it contracted sharply, but that the contraction was less than many people feared and the total amount given was within the range of the level of giving seen over the past few years. Giving as a percentage of GDP was 2.2%, within the normal range and very close to the 2.3% of GDP that was given in 2007…

Charitable giving behaved more or less as it normally does when the economy sours. This is, by most measures, the worst recession in a very long time and so we’re seeing charitable giving get hit. But it is only declining in line with the way it normally behaves.

As a reminder, if this recession is similar to other economic downturns, it will take the philanthropic/nonprofit sector longer to recover than the rest of the economy.  The Giving USA authors commented in a discussion hosted by the Chronicle of Philanthropy that this recession resembles the one in1974 , when took three years for giving to rebound.  However, they cautioned against assuming that this would be an accurate guide, noting the changes in the world and the nonprofit sector.

Related Coverage

• Charitable Donations Fell by Nearly 6% in 2008, the Sharpest Drop in 53 Years
• Charitable Giving Fell by 2 Percent in 2008, ‘Giving USA’ Says

Other Giving Reports

• Foundation Center 2009 Foundation Giving Forecast
• 2009 Giving Forecast by Minnesota Grantmakers
• MCF 2009 Outlook Report

What’s a nonprofit to do? Start contingency planning

During the Giving USA chat, someone brought up the question of budgeting amidst so much uncertainty:

Question from Hazel, animal charity: How can one do any financial planning or construct a budget for the coming year when it may even be worse than last year and no one knows whom we can depend on?

Nancy Raybin:  Agree on different scenarios, e.g. economy gets worse by 10 percent, economy levels; economy gets better by 10 percent. Make some hypotheses about the impact of different scenarios on your animal charity’s activities and what donors are likely to do. Then prepare different budgets for each scenario. Clearly, you know best how animal lovers respond in these times. You must also have a number of donors on whom you can depend. Focus on those.

Sometimes it feels like I’m beating the scenario planning drum all time, but it really is the best advice we can give to help nonprofits plan and adapt in these uncertain times. Download and use our tools to get started.

This Week’s Harvest

• A Nonprofit News Round-Up from Not-For Profit Accounting,  including:
  • Bringing the Stimulus Plan Home: Obama’s Effect on Nonprofit Jobs
  • 7 Things To Consider For Your D&O Policy
• British Charity Mergers Examined
• FASB Releases Standard for Nonprofit M&A

Employee Compensation

Recently there’s been a lot of chatter about nonprofit wages in the blogosphere and beyond. Debating these questions is important, but in this age of tight budgets, are there any steps an organization can take to improve employee compensation right now? Especially for lower wage employees who are critical to an organization’s success, but are sometimes left out of this conversation.

Blue Avocado gets to the heart of the matter in the article Low-Wage Workers and Nonprofits:

While raising salaries would be, by far, the best way to support these important staff, doing so isn’t possible for most nonprofits: certainly not in the short term, and often impossible for the long term given business models and funding constraints…

Although the challenge of providing adequate compensation to low-wage employees may seem overwhelming, especially during a financial crisis, the fact is that nonprofits, consultants and funders can consider a number of helpful options without torpedoing the budget.

The article offers a range of options, which fall into three main categories:

• Steps to take relatively quickly at little or no cost
• Intermediate steps
• More far-reaching steps

These ideas are not intended to replace a real conversation about wages, especially one that goes beyond executive compensation.  But they are a place to start. Add your thoughts and suggestions here or leave a comment at Blue Avocado.

Related HR Resources

Not-For-Profit Accounting shares some information from the intersection of HR and accounting.  This post unpacks the sometimes woolly world of employee classifications — exempt vs. nonexempt, independent contractor vs. employee — and provides information on payroll systems.

If you have specific questions about nonprofit account, I suggest submitting them to Alan.  His regular Q&A feature is a great resource for financial managers.

New Resource Collection

Blue Avocado has compiled all of their articles about nonprofits and the economy. Visit this archive for information on financial management, HR, and more.

Harvest

• IRS Form 990 Filing Tips: Part VI, Governance 
• Nonprofit Policy News | May 2009
  • Federal Legislative and Regulatory Developments
  • IRS makes public its 2009- 2013 strategic plan
• Free Foundation Center Widgets
• Charities Loosening Strings on Arts Grants

The Chronicle of Philanthropy and Nonprofit Finance Fund are hosting a special series of discussions to help nonprofits address challenges during this recession.

This week’s topic was New Ways for Arts Organizations to Finance Their Operations.  There was an interesting conversation about the ideas of mergers and new ways to raise revenue.

Generating Revenue

Clara Miller: Starting up and growing a new line of business requires investment all its own, and may take years to actually contribute net revenue to operations. And earned revenue is the lion’s share of most arts orgs’ revenue now.  I have seen a variety of creative approaches to wringing more net revenue out of the current business platform:

Examples cited by Clara Miller and Holly Sidford:

• “Meet the artist” salons and other forms of patron engagement
• Deploying artists into the community in various venues (hospitals, schools, etc.)
• Partnerships with business, universities, etc
• 2 for 1 tickets
• Pay-as-you-can admissions
• Free outdoor events with a pass-the-hat request for donations
• Special deals for members and subscribers (perks like free parking, better seats, meet the artists opportunities, free admission to other events)

What ideas is your organization trying to boost revenue?

Mergers and Strategic Collaborations

Clara Miller: From a purely practical perspective, sharing performance space or tech equipment, for example, can be challenging because the nights when ticket sales are highest tend to be the same, and times when rehearsal is needed is similarly clustered. I think that “neutral” platforms–those run commercially, sometimes as cooperatives themselves–are worth looking into because they are already scaled, and actually large enough to benefit from economies of scale–two (or even 12) small arts organizations may get some scale economics, but internal complexity will be problematic in reaching true economies, and will require new skill sets and systems to be built.

Holly Sidford: Arts groups ought to look for opportunities to economize on shared services with non-arts organizations as well as arts groups…it may be more difficult for two arts groups in a given discipline to combine forces than for arts groups to collaborate across discipline lines (dance and theater, for example, or music and dance), or to combine with educational, social service or even health organizations.

An example from the discussion:

The Great Lakes Music Festival, the Eisenhower Dance Ensemble and the Detroit Chamber Winds & Strings, share physical space, marketing staff, and development staff, and accounting among other numerous functions.

More resources and ideas about nonprofit collaborations:

• Fieldstone Alliance’s Tools You Can Use: Engagement Strategies: Making the Most of Working Together

• Foundation Center’s From the Answer Desk: What do I need to know about collaboration and other kinds of strategic alliances?

Other Artful Resources

• Arts in Crisis: A Kennedy Center Initiative

• Springboard for the Arts - check out their delicious account for great resources, and an example of how an organization can aggregate and share information

• smArts & Culture (If you’re on twitter, follow Maryann)

Nonprofit Harvest

• White House Officials Discuss Plans for Social-Innovation Office

• More ways to track stimulus spending in Minnesota and around the country

The administrative cost ratio, always the topic of heated discussion, is in the news again. Not-For Profit Accounting blogged on the topic this week, unpacking the accounting jargon and rules:

A nonprofit’s expenses are classified by what they were used for within the three broad categories / functional areas of administration, program and fundraising.  Program costs are considered direct expenses, expenses that have a direct effect on fulfilling the mission of the nonprofit organization.  Administrative costs are indirect expenses, they affect the mission of the organization indirectly.  The organization can’t get by without those expenses but, according to the IRS and others, they have no direct effect on the mission.

This point, of course, can be argued and I think it is where much of the confusion resides when talking about classifying nonprofit expenses.  But this is the world we operate in and those are the rules, so it is best to make sure we understand the rules so we can present our numbers in the most honest fashion to show what it costs to do the work we do.

He also contributed his take on what the ratio really means:

One financial ratio used in isolation is no true measure of any organization.  Only by looking at both the numbers and the program outcomes can we judge whether an organization is effective or not.

There’s too much at stake right now to use this ratio alone to measure effectiveness, let alone as a way to compete with one another for already diminished resources.  Kate brought up a similar question last year in her post, Irrelevant Ratios:

We need a two-step retirement plan. First is to jointly stop using the ratio as a way to distinguish our organizations from others, in an unhealthy type of competition, as in “our administrative ratio only is 5%, so your donated dollar will go farther with us.” The second is to find a better way to convey the quality and effectiveness of the work that you do, which requires a real method of evaluating and communicating the programs and impact on clients.

Administrative costs are part of doing business.  It takes time and money to run an effective organization, and being efficient with those dollars is not the same as being effective with them.

End of Session Resources

• Weigh-in on unallotment before Governor acts from MCN’s Nonprofit Policy News
• The Legislature has Left the Building, Pawlenty’s Poised to Make Cuts-What’s a Nonprofit to Do? from Philanthropy Potluck

This Week’s Harvest

• The Cohen Report: Finding Nonprofits in President Obama’s FY2010 Budget
• Philanthropists Set Spending Deadlines from the Wall Street Journal
• New to the Nonprofit Sector? Here’s a BRIEF Overview from Nonprofit Leadership 601
  
• Survival Strategies for the Arts from Blue Avocado

This week the Chronicle of Philanthropy and Nonprofit Finance Fund launched their discussion series, Financial Management in Tough Times.

The first topic was Financing Options, which included information about loans, PRIs, and other financing options.  Coincidentally, at the same time we were hosting a Social Enterprise Network on capital sources and touched on many of the same topics.

This week’s post gathers definitions and resources shared by participants of both discussions. For more details, I suggest you read the transcript at the Chronicle of Philanthropy’s website or Not-For Profit Accounting’s summary.

Program Related Investments (PRIs)

A PRI is a tool foundations can use to provide capital to nonprofit organizations.  It is more like a loan than a grant because it must be repaid or otherwise provide a return for the foundation.  In their PRI Primer, the PRI Makers Network lays out the benefits of these investments:

PRIs give charitable organizations or commercial ventures access to needed capital, typically at favorable terms. In return, the funder benefits in several ways:

• It is often able to recycle PRI payments for subsequent charitable investments.
• The foundation is generally able to count PRIs toward its minimum five percent payout of net assets.
• PRIs allow foundations of every type and size to have greater programmatic impact.

Resources

• The Hidden Gems of Foundation Funds from Balancing the Mission Checkbook

• What is a Program Related Investment? from the Foundation Center

• PRI Makers Network

• Program-Related Investing guide from Grantcraft

• Calvert Foundation

Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs)

Community Development Financial Institutions are vehicles to foster economic growth and ensure access to capital in urban and rural low-income communities.  Many CDFI’s focus on affordable housing and economic development activities.  Others, like Nonprofits Assistance Fund and Nonprofit Finance Fund, specialize in providing credit and financial training to nonprofit organizations that serve low-income and underserved populations.

• Learn more about the CDFI Fund

• To find a nearby CDFI, use the Member Locator on Opportunity Finance Network’s website

Loans and Lines of Credit

Clara Miller issues an important reminder that “loans are never a substitute for revenue” and makes an excellent case for when credit makes sense for your organization. For more information you can also read our Borrowing Guide.

Download our Cash Flow Template to help assess whether or not credit can help your organization bridge a gap caused by grant timing, delays in government reimbursements, or other accounts receivable.

Nonprofit Harvest

• Now What?

• Nonprofits Buying Into Franchises from The Nonprofit Times

• State And Local Governments Consider Fees on Nonprofit Groups