Build a Winning Program

For nonprofits, there might be another lesson here: How can you transform your team from just another mid-major hoping to get invited to the dance into a legitimate contender each every year?  How can you be the nonprofit version of Gonzaga’s basketball program?

Here are some ways to improve your financial practices and lay the groundwork for a sustainable organization.

Recruiting Your Team

In order to be successful, you need the right team members for your organization’s staff and board.  Here are some resources to help you recruit and work with board members:

• Treasurer and Finance Committee – Who to Recruit and How to Use Them
• Recruiting and Vetting Nonprofit Board Members

Coaching and Strategy

A successful coach sets their team up for success.  They draw up plays that have the best chance of scoring, but ultimately trust their players to implement it.  Likewise, boards and staff leadership engage in strategic planning, develop realistic budgets, and put their organizations on the path to success.

• This Scenario Planning Worksheet is a step by step guide to contingency planning.  This resource will help you consider several possible scenarios and get ready to make informed budget and management decisions.

Practice, Practice, Practice

Successful teams spend the necessary time developing and honing their skills. At Nonprofits Assistance Fund, we have a resources and trainings that can help you improve your financial management.

But practice is more than just training and skill development. It’s also about working together effectively, staying in rhythm, building on what’s working and rethinking what is less successful.  Nonprofits need to keep their financial reports, cash flow projections, and other key benchmarks up to date. Without this information, it’s hard to know where to focus your efforts.

• Managing Cash Flow and the Cash Flow Template are resources to help you understand your organization’s cash position . Many organizations have an uneven cash flow. Recognizing when you may need additional capital will help you plan.

Rally Supporters

Successful teams have fans.  So do nonprofits.  Effective nonprofits are able to leverage their volunteers and in-kind donations to save resources and strengthen their organization.

• Blue Avocado has an excellent resource, Tracking Volunteer Time to Boost Your Bottom Line: A Complete Accounting Guide, to help you get the most out of your volunteers, including how to improve your financial position by accurately reflecting the value of this donated time.
• If you’re looking for a good primer about in-kind donations, Alan the Nonprofit Accountant, answers many common questions, including how to record donations at auctions and other events.

For another take on how March Madness can inspire nonprofits, check out Razoo’s March Goodness.

Here are a few other things for that to-do list.

Assess Your Hyperlocal Conditions

We can all agree that local conditions vary. I just returned from a brief vacation to sunny Florida, and these words have never felt more true.  Nonprofit Quarterly took used idea as the theme for their Winter 2010 issue.

Local Conditions

There are many factors that impact your nonprofit, such as your funding sources, field of service, and the needs of your constituents.  Let’s think of these as the local conditions. The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits and Minnesota Council on Foundations have updated information on how the economy is affecting funders and Minnesota nonprofits in general. National Organizations such as The Foundation Center, NFF (view information from 2009 or take the 2010 survey), and the National Council of Nonprofits all have good resources that can help you take action.  However, these reports can only take you so far.

Go Hyperlocal

The most useful information is the “hyperlocal” conditions – what is happening on the ground at your nonprofit. As our ED, Kate Barr, says in her article for Nonprofit Quarterly:

“In all forecasts, ‘local conditions vary,’ and the most relevant information is the situation at an individual nonprofit organization. Only by clearly understanding its own financial position, strengths, and risks can a nonprofit develop strategies to respond to the economy and plan for the future.”

How can you get a handle on the conditions at your nonprofit? Our Assessment of Recession Risk and Preparedness for Nonprofit Organizations is a tool designed to help you quickly assess your organization. By answering these 20 questions, you will identify potential risk factors, immediate priorities, and proactive steps to take right away. Keep in mind; this is a first step, not an in-depth organizational assessment.

Whatever is happening on the ground at your organization, the Recession Preparedness Assessment provides useful information to help you better understand what’s happening and develop strategic responses. You can read the full article in Nonprofit Quarterly or download the Assessment from our website.

Re-Set Your Internal Controls

Internal controls are another factor that can impact a nonprofit’s stability. Smaller organizations in particular are often cited for lacking adequate segregation of duties in management letters.  Blue Avocado’s recent article,  Five Internal Controls for the Very Small Nonprofit, is a great starting point to help you strengthen your internal controls.  CPA Carl Ho outlines five main categories that are crucial, and do-able, for even the smallest organizations:

1. Set the control environment
2. Assign responsibilities
3. Physical controls – lock it up
4. Cash, always have two people count it together
5. Reconcile the bank statement

Read the whole article for additional suggestions and examples.  For more on this topic, you can participate in our webinar on February 22nd, Financial Policies for Internal Control.  You’ll receive sample board and management policies and learn how to customize them for your organization.

Know Your True Program Costs

More on everyone’s favorite topic – overhead! (If you missed our past blogs about overhead, and why we think it’s an overrated metric, start here.) Last week the Chronicle of Philanthropy hosted a discussion on Making Smart Decisions About Overhead Costs.  What cannot be said enough is the importance of knowing (and then budgeting for) the true, full costs of your programs and operations. As Daniel Stid of The BridgeSpan Group stated:

It goes without saying (but perhaps we should say it!) that having a clear view of the full direct and indirect costs of delivering a program is essential. We often encounter situations in which clients have failed to budget even for their full direct costs let alone so called overhead.

It has to be said, explicitly, because too many organizations do not know the actual costs of delivering their services.  We have a workshop dedicated to this topic, and I encourage any Minnesotans with questions to attend our April training Calculating True Program Costs.  If you don’t live here, or don’t want to wait until April, check out Nonprofit Cost Analysis: Introduction from the BridgeSpan Group.  It’s a thorough introduction and very helpful, although it may not be the most accessible to those without a strong financial foundation.

Update Your Bookmarks!

Intrepid nonprofit accounting guru and friend of the blog Alan Strand has has moved. Not-For-Profit Accounting remains a helpful resource, but for new content from Alan visit Nonprofit Accounting, a resource from the Nonprofit Center in Washington State.

I think it’s interesting, and timely, that in the last few weeks both my original and adopted hometowns blew me away by their community and collaborative spirit.

Partnerships That Produce Results

First, Buffalo, NY took full advantage of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition coming to town, using the opportunity to transform an entire neighborhood and illustrate the importance of green building practices, such as deconstruction.

Then Minnesotans donated more than $14 million dollars to 3,141 nonprofit organizations in 24 hours, setting a national record. That is certainly above average.

Wow.

Neither effort would have been possible without significant community support – in the form of 5,000 volunteers and 38,778 donors, respectively – as well as the work of countless organizations behind the the scenes and some public-private partnerships.

There is no reaction except to be humbled. But there are lessons that we can learn for projects large and small.

Let’s Collaborate

Right now, everyone who wants to improve the nonprofit sector is emphasizing collaboration.  Certainly in some instances the results are impressive.  But successful partnerships take a lot of work and trust.

There is no one size fits all model. Collaborations range from joining forces on a project to combining backroom operations to a full merger.  Advantages include increasing impact or taking advantage of unique skill sets, such as in these examples, and minimizing costs.  Challenges include letting go of control, managing the needs of diverse stakeholders, and confusion around roles and responsibilities.

GiveMN as an Example

The GiveMN Give to the Max Day effort was incredibly successful in promoting individual giving, engaging new donors, increasing online donations, and getting significant amounts of cash into the hands of nonprofit organizations.

However, there was also confusion around some details, especially the matching funds. Regardless of how the uncertainty happened, it underscores the importance of clear communications among stakeholders – in this case that includes the 3,141 nonprofits, 38,778 donors, and the project partners.  Everyone needs to be on the same page about project goals and outcomes.

Beyond illustrating the widespread community support for Minnesota’s nonprofit sector, GiveMN also shows that nonprofits and their supporters can effectively use social media and other online tools to leverage their networks to take action.  There was an earned media blitz from the partners, but organizations and individuals took advantage of email, facebook, and twitter to get the word out.  The very nature of social media is collaborative.

What are your stories of collaboration? What lessons have you learned from those experiences?

Case Studies

• Nonprofit Collaboration Case Studies
• Where Can I Find Case Studies of Nonprofit Collaborations, Mergers, and Other Strategic Alliances?
• Joining Forces in the Back Office – Lodestar Foundation Resources
• Interview: Collaboration Prize Co-Winners
• What happens when two competitors combine forces
• By sharing expertise, agencies are able to improve operations, save money and help more clients

Tools and Resources

• What do I need to know about collaboration and other kinds of strategic alliances?
• Nonprofit Mergers and Acquisitions: More Than a Tool for Tough Times
• Project ReDesign and Merge Minnesota

Scenario Planning

The McKinsey Quarterly recently wrote an article about the advantages (and some potential pitfalls) of scenario planning.  At Nonprofits Assistance Fund, we love scenario planning for the reasons laid out in McKinsey Quarterly:

Scenarios are a powerful tool in the strategist’s armory. They are particularly useful in developing strategies to navigate the kinds of extreme events we have recently seen in the world economy. Scenarios enable the strategist to steer a course between the false certainty of a single forecast and the confused paralysis that often strike in troubled times.

What’s in your Planning Toolbox?

Here are some resources that can help you craft your own scenarios.

• Scenario Planning tools:
  • Scenario Planning Example
  • Scenario Planning Worksheet: A blank template for you to use
• Cash flow template
• Contingency and Scenario Planning – What’s the Difference and How Do Nonprofits Get Started?
• Focus on the Destination, Not the Route (Budget)!

You can also read Kate’s post on this topic, What H1N1 Taught Me About Contingency Planning.

The Wall Street Journal Makes It Personal

Why is management advice to the philanthropic sector filed under personal finance?

This section includes commentary about foundation payout rates, general operating support, social enterprise, public-private partnerships, and corporate philanthropy – not personal finance. There is a related blog post on how financial advisers can help their clients maintain their charitable giving in a recession, but it’s not part of the special section.

At least the New York Times section on Giving is part of their US coverage.

Why It Matters

This might seem off topic, but when business leaders (and their publications) tell nonprofits how to behave, how to improve, how to be more efficient and effective, while also treating us as an afterthought, that’s a problem.  It underscore how little time and energy they spend thinking about the challenges – and possible solutions – for our sector.

And I think it also explains why often the rallying cry is “be more like business,” even when that doesn’t make sense.

Philanthropic Investments

If you read about Goldman Sach’s Foundation’s unusual investment strategies, you might be curious about “traditional” investments.  The ideas of prudence and risk management – because the funds are intended to benefit the community – underscore most philanthropic investment strategies.

In her blog post from last year, Jittery About Investments, Kate lays out some fundamental guidelines for nonprofits:

• Time Horizon – Funds that may be needed within a few months must be invested in highly liquid, safe investments. This is the most common type of investment fund for most nonprofits, composed of operating funds and reserves. In order to be assured that the funds will be available as needed, the investment choice must be readily available.

• Risk Tolerance – One of the fundamentals of investing is the balance of risk versus return. Investments with a higher return almost always also come with higher risk. The key question for nonprofit leaders and boards is to understand how much risk is involved and to decide if they can accept the risk. As an example, if the funds to be invested represent the balance of a large program grant that will be spent over the next year, then the organization can’t afford to risk the loss of any of the funds. A permanent endowment fund, on the other hand, is usually invested in a diverse portfolio that includes more risk in return for a higher long-term return.

• Responsibility – The nonprofit’s board of directors is responsible for overseeing this balance of risk and return for the health of the organization and any legal requirements. In order to fulfill this responsibility the board must act as prudent and loyal stewards of the organization’s assets.

Here are some additional resources:

• Notes from Endowment and Investment Policies
• The Chronicle of Philanthropy’s Special Report on Endowments
• The Care and Feeding of a Healthy Organization
• It’s 10 am, do you know where your cash is?
• Cash is Cash, Sometimes

Foundations can also use mission-related investments and program-related investments as part of their portfolio. Learn more about MRIs and PRIs:

• Aggregating Impact: A Funder’s Guide to Mission Investment Intermediaries
• Philanthropy’s New Passing Gear: Mission-Related Investing
• PRI Makers Network
• Program-Related Investing guide from Grantcraft

Nonprofit Harvest

• A four-part series from Nonprofit Capital Management’s blog on tax deductible business expenses
  • Transportation and mileage
    
  • Travel
  • Office moves
  • Education
• Fiscal Sponsorship Revisited from the Nonprofit Law Blog
• MCF Research on Giving Trends Released
• The L3C: A new business model for socially responsible investing

National Council of Nonprofits has produced a series of Special Reports on the economy.  Their most recent update, Strategies Being Used by Nonprofit Leaders To Cope with the Nation’s Economic Crisis, summarizes findings from a range of reports and provides some key takeaways.  I found the first tip is particularly interesting:

[B]eing transparent about financial challenges and “staying close to funders” emerged as an essential strategy for many organizations. Savvy nonprofits are asking grantmakers to be transparent – because nonprofits need to know how much to expect, and within what timeframe, in order to conduct realistic financial planning. For instance, asking foundations to expedite payments,  in these times when “cash flow” for many nonprofits feels like “cash drip,” is a fair thing to ask.  Likewise, it is better to hear bad news – that a grant will be smaller, or delayed, or even discontinued – earlier rather than later so that adjustments can be made immediately.

Until you have information about the likelihood and timing of grants and other sources of revenue, it’s hard to engage in realistic contingency planning.  The Minnesota Council of Foundations is doing their best to gather and aggregate data on how Minnesota grantmakers are responding to economy.

• Updated 2009 Giving Outlook 
• 2009 Giving Forecast by Minnesota Grantmakers

Nonprofits Assistance Fund has also created materials to help organizations manage cash flow and make informed financial management decisions.

• Cash flow template
• Scenario Planning tools:
  • Scenario Planning Example
  • Scenario Planning Worksheet: A blank template for you to use

To see all of our financial management tools and articles, visit the Resources section of our website.

Nonprofit Harvest

Training and Resources

• New! Blue Avocado Webinars
• Human Resources for Nonprofits Update from Not For-Profit Accounting
  
• Alternatives to Forming a Charitable Nonprofit an article from Gene Takagi and Emily Chan of the Nonprofit Law Blog
  

Social Enterprise

• More Details on the Social Innovation Fund from Foundation Center DC
  
• New corporate structure could give social entrepreneurs new funding stream
• Foundation portfolios, proxy action leverage social change from MinnPost

News and Other Updates

• Sales tax breaks for nonprofits: New rules in the works from MinnPost
• Weathering The Storm – Financial Health Standard from Charities Review Council

A few weeks ago, Blue Avocado published a great post about the value of Dashboard reports:

Imagine getting a dashboard like this at every board meeting. With a glance, board members could see how the organization is doing and start asking the important questions. The board would also be able to discuss what indicators should be added to the dashboard and which might not be necessary…

It’s hard to imagine driving a car without quick, ongoing access to a speedometer, fuel gauge, or gear position. An organizational Dashboard can be the same, fast way to check in on basics . . . so you can pay more attention to where you’re going.

It was a timely article, because we had just revamped our own dashboards.  We wanted to make sure we were giving the board and staff the most useful metrics about our finances, programs, and other work.  The end result is more useful dashboard for board and staff, but just was useful was a by-product of the process.  It forced all of us to take a step back and consider what information we’re sharing and why.

As the Blue Avocado article states, it doesn’t tell us where we’re going, but it provides critical information that allows us to focus on our work and the road ahead.  A tool that helps you cut through the noise and focus is a great asset.

For more on dashboards, read What Gauges Belong on Your Dashboard? or Seth Godin’s post, Dashboards.

Overhead

There is an interesting debate swirling about nonprofit overhead expenses.  Are they an investment in infrastructure,  money that could be better spent on programs, or something in between? Do donors care?  Should they?  This is Kate’s take:

Here’s my soapbox

I agree that it’s wise to “Do the same due diligence on your donations that you would your investments or your business.” But when I review an investment opportunity, I review based on the expected criteria for a successful business – profitability, market share, and returns. I don’t review their overhead and management costs. So why would overhead be the criteria for a charity?

…Do some due diligence on charities before you donate, just as you would for an investment or business opportunity. Pay especially close attention to how successful the nonprofit has been at achieving its mission. Do they provide information about how effective their programs are and what impact they have on the people and communities that they serve? Do they have a way to measure and communicate progress and/or success?

Join the conversation at Balancing the Mission Checkbook, facebook, or follow the example of Rich Cowles from Charities Review Council and blog about your position.

Late July Harvest

Mergers

• Joining Forces in the Back Office – Lodestar Foundation Resources
• Nonprofit mergers: Putting the best foot forward

IRS Updates

• IRS Releases Final Regulations for Returns of Small Groups
• IRS Training Materials – Governance

Other Resources

• Workshop Resources, Questions and Answers
• Nonprofit Leadership 601: New to Running a Nonprofit: Here’s an Overabundance of Resources
• Turning Crisis Into Opportunity: A Conversation With Two Nonprofit Sector Leaders

Crowdsourcing: What’s Working, What’s Not

A few weeks ago, Kate issued a call for “stories of change and transformation” and in the comments we talked a little bit about how we could leverage the power of our online community and crowd source this. I’ve had a few conversations about tools and tags, but before we jump into tactics, I wanted to ask:

• Is this happening elsewhere?
• Is anyone interested is collaborating on this kind of project?

Let me know in the comments.

As some organizations are tapping into their cash reserves to minimize the impact of diminishing resources on their programs, the question of how to use and manage these funds keeps surfacing.

On one hand, organizations lucky enough to have this rainy day fund are wise to consider best practices and consult their own internal policies around using reserves.  The Foundation Center recently did a feature, How Much Should My Nonprofit Have in Operating Reserves? Review their article for a list of resources.

However, the time may have come to ask a different set of questions. In Beyond Cash Reserves, Kate advocates for a new kind of thinking about cash – that working capital is king:

Rather than dwelling on the best practice or target for designated cash reserve accounts, maybe nonprofits need to learn to be more sophisticated managers of cash and its relative, working capital.

The Social Innovation Fund

Tactical Philanthropy is covering the Social Innovation Fund (What Exactly is the Social Innovation Fund? and Why the Social Innovation Fund Matters).  He draws attention to a number of reasons this is an important development, but he keys in on the value of growth capital:

The Social Innovation Fund is the first meaningful incentive for large foundations to provide growth capital to nonprofits.

The Fund is providing cash grants to grantmakers. Most grantmakers are stuck with the endowment they have and do not have access to additional funding. But the Fund requires that grantmakers use this money (plus matching funds from the foundation’s endowment) to provide growth capital and capacity building grants to nonprofits.

L3C – The New Kid on the Block

Increased access to capital is one reason the L3C model is such a hot topic (we have covered it here before).   A new post from Foundation Center does a good job of summarizing the available information and discussion about L3C, including sharing some examples from Vermont. To learn more you can also read Notes from Capital Sources, Options, and Structures.

Another Round of Reports

The Minnesota Perspective

The Minnesota Council on Foundations (MCF) has released an updated 2009 Outlook report.  Key findings include:

• In March 2009, 52% of Minnesota grantmakers said they expect to decrease grantmaking in 2009, more than the 40% who anticipated decreases in November 2008.

• Nearly half of Minnesota grantmakers expect giving will remain the same (31%) or increase (17%) in 2009 compared to 2008. In November, 41% expected grantmaking to remain the same in 2009, while 15% expected increases.

• In relation to the economic downturn, grantmakers say they are most likely to provide support for food, housing and jobs.

• Minnesota grantmakers report the most likely ways they will cut operating costs is by reducing travel and conference attendance, eliminating salary increases, and reducing or eliminating the use of consultants.

Warren Woolfe at the Star Tribune recently covered the struggles of Minnesota’s nonprofits to address rising needs with fewer resources in his article, Anxiety on the rise at area’s nonprofits.  You can also read MinnPost’s three-part story on the Minnesota economy, starting with The big question for economic recovery: Which stresses are merely cyclical and which indicate a cold, new reality?

The National Perspective

The Chronicle of Philanthropy also reported on two national surveys on the impact of the recession on the nonprofit sector:

• Ninety-two percent of the nearly 100 respondents in a survey conducted in May by the Bridgespan Group said they were feeling the effects of the downturn.

• Eighty percent of charity officials reported that their organizations were experiencing financial stress, in another study conducted in April by the Johns Hopkins University’s Listening Post Project. Nearly 40 percent of the 363 respondents described the stress as “severe.”

Two findings from the Bridgespan Survey struck me as particularly timely:

Finding No. 2: More organizations are tapping into reserves. Also, more nonprofit leaders are developing contingency plans, a key step that can help them respond purposefully when crises arise, and also prepare for better times ahead.

Finding No. 3: The deepening recession has led more nonprofits to lay off staff and reduce program activity, while taking action to protect core services and activities. The specific tactics used to cope with the downturn have varied by organization size. But now, more than ever, it is important to identify the people who matter most to an organization, and to keep that group strong.

If you need help grappling with these decisions, you can visit our resource page. It has contingency planning tools and other resources from Nonprofits Assistance Fund and other capacity building organizations.

Nonprofit Harvest

• Finding Inspiration from Founders
• Pawlenty shifts mean schools need loans; charters especially worried
• Nonprofits Carrying out the Stimulus-or Trying to
• IRS Info and Some Questions and Answers
• Just what the prez ordered: $$ for community clinics

Summer Bloggin’

This summer we’re going to be writing this blog every few weeks. We’re working on some exciting projects, so stay tuned for information about new opportunities.

If you need a regular dose of nonprofit financial management news, follow us on twitter. You can also check out Tactical Philanthropy’s Daily Digest, PhilanTopic’s Weekend Link Roundup,  or Not-For Profit Accounting’s Nonprofit News feature.

On the heels of last week’s post on the Giving USA annual study, we have more data to digest. MCN recently released their Current Conditions Report for June 2009:

Minnesota’s nonprofits continue to be seriously affected by the recession. Nonprofits are bracing for extended impacts from the reduction in revenue they have already seen and expect to continue to see in the coming months and years.

• Organizations relying on state, local or federal government are seeing varying levels of unreliability in payments to them from government, making it increasingly difficult for organizations to plan accordingly. Exacerbating this is the threat of unallotment for many organizations.
• A majority of organizations report an increase in demand for services, yet many are still having to cut back on staff.
• All major nonprofit revenue sources (contributions, government funding, foundation grants, and earned income) are reported to be down from economic affects.
• Small organizations are feeling the worst affects, with far more reporting declines in revenue and cash shortfalls. Small organizations are also the least likely to have available reserves or a line of credit to fall back on.

These findings are echoed by other studies (here and here).  Although the specifics vary from state to state, and among organization type and size, people in our sector are doing their best to meet demands with fewer resources.

We are all trying to prudently cut costs in ways that minimize the impact on our mission and overall capacity. This is a tall order, especially when combined with increasing needs for service. How do you go about making those tough choices?

A Four Step Framework

Our executive director, Kate Barr and Judy Alnes of MAP for Nonprofits wrote an article for MCF’s Winter Giving Forum, Nonprofit Survival: Four Steps to Take Now:

Economic uncertainty and the threat of impending doom are not unfamiliar territory for nonprofit organizations. We’ve lived through multiple downturns and have “right-sized” ourselves time and time again. Philanthropic organizations have done likewise.

But something feels uncharted about this downturn. Perhaps it’s the fact that it has fallen on the heels of a downturn from which we never really recovered. Perhaps the global nature of the economic stress makes us see ourselves in a broader context. In any event, this fire is real and hot.

Then they lay out four steps to help you make decisions:

• Focus
• Identify Your Most Important Work
• Seek and Speak Financial Truth
• Review Size, Scope and Structure

Read the rest of the article for more information on this helpful framework.

Other Resources

• Improving Cash Flow Management In Challenging Times: A Primer from Nonprofit Quarterly
• Our Cash Flow Template and Nonprofit Scenario Planning Tools
• Nonprofit Layoffs and Furloughs: Do Them Right from Blue Avocado

More resources are available at Sustenance in Lean Times, our resource collection.

This Week’s Harvest

• Governor’s Unallotment Plan
• Check out the Nonprofit Quarterly’s Daily Digest – the Nonprofit Newswire
• Strategies for Hard Times: The Case for Sustainable Funding
• Charities Review Council unveiled a draft of their updated Accountability Standards
• Recession Resources for Artists and Arts Organizations

This week, Giving USA released their report on 2008 giving.  As nonprofits can attest, it was a rough year.  According to the study, total giving decreased by 5.7%, with donations down across the board.

• Individual giving: -6.3 percent
• Foundation grantmaking: -0.8 percent
• Corporate giving: -8 percent
• Charitable bequests: -6.4 percent
• Two-thirds of public charities experienced a decline in donations.

However, even in the worst economic climate since the Great Depression, charitable giving exceeded $300 billion.

Over at Tactical Philanthropy, Sean does some excellent analysis in his post How Much Did Americans Really Give in 2008?

So what’s the take away? I would say that the best way to think about charitable giving in 2008 is that it contracted sharply, but that the contraction was less than many people feared and the total amount given was within the range of the level of giving seen over the past few years. Giving as a percentage of GDP was 2.2%, within the normal range and very close to the 2.3% of GDP that was given in 2007…

Charitable giving behaved more or less as it normally does when the economy sours. This is, by most measures, the worst recession in a very long time and so we’re seeing charitable giving get hit. But it is only declining in line with the way it normally behaves.

As a reminder, if this recession is similar to other economic downturns, it will take the philanthropic/nonprofit sector longer to recover than the rest of the economy.  The Giving USA authors commented in a discussion hosted by the Chronicle of Philanthropy that this recession resembles the one in1974 , when took three years for giving to rebound.  However, they cautioned against assuming that this would be an accurate guide, noting the changes in the world and the nonprofit sector.

Related Coverage

• Charitable Donations Fell by Nearly 6% in 2008, the Sharpest Drop in 53 Years
• Charitable Giving Fell by 2 Percent in 2008, ‘Giving USA’ Says

Other Giving Reports

• Foundation Center 2009 Foundation Giving Forecast
• 2009 Giving Forecast by Minnesota Grantmakers
• MCF 2009 Outlook Report

What’s a nonprofit to do? Start contingency planning

During the Giving USA chat, someone brought up the question of budgeting amidst so much uncertainty:

Question from Hazel, animal charity: How can one do any financial planning or construct a budget for the coming year when it may even be worse than last year and no one knows whom we can depend on?

Nancy Raybin:  Agree on different scenarios, e.g. economy gets worse by 10 percent, economy levels; economy gets better by 10 percent. Make some hypotheses about the impact of different scenarios on your animal charity’s activities and what donors are likely to do. Then prepare different budgets for each scenario. Clearly, you know best how animal lovers respond in these times. You must also have a number of donors on whom you can depend. Focus on those.

Sometimes it feels like I’m beating the scenario planning drum all time, but it really is the best advice we can give to help nonprofits plan and adapt in these uncertain times. Download and use our tools to get started.

This Week’s Harvest

• A Nonprofit News Round-Up from Not-For Profit Accounting,  including:
  • Bringing the Stimulus Plan Home: Obama’s Effect on Nonprofit Jobs
  • 7 Things To Consider For Your D&O Policy
• British Charity Mergers Examined
• FASB Releases Standard for Nonprofit M&A

A nonprofit’s expenses are classified by what they were used for within the three broad categories / functional areas of administration, program and fundraising.  Program costs are considered direct expenses, expenses that have a direct effect on fulfilling the mission of the nonprofit organization.  Administrative costs are indirect expenses, they affect the mission of the organization indirectly.  The organization can’t get by without those expenses but, according to the IRS and others, they have no direct effect on the mission.

This point, of course, can be argued and I think it is where much of the confusion resides when talking about classifying nonprofit expenses.  But this is the world we operate in and those are the rules, so it is best to make sure we understand the rules so we can present our numbers in the most honest fashion to show what it costs to do the work we do.

He also contributed his take on what the ratio really means:

One financial ratio used in isolation is no true measure of any organization.  Only by looking at both the numbers and the program outcomes can we judge whether an organization is effective or not.

There’s too much at stake right now to use this ratio alone to measure effectiveness, let alone as a way to compete with one another for already diminished resources.  Kate brought up a similar question last year in her post, Irrelevant Ratios:

We need a two-step retirement plan. First is to jointly stop using the ratio as a way to distinguish our organizations from others, in an unhealthy type of competition, as in “our administrative ratio only is 5%, so your donated dollar will go farther with us.” The second is to find a better way to convey the quality and effectiveness of the work that you do, which requires a real method of evaluating and communicating the programs and impact on clients.

Administrative costs are part of doing business.  It takes time and money to run an effective organization, and being efficient with those dollars is not the same as being effective with them.

End of Session Resources

• Weigh-in on unallotment before Governor acts from MCN’s Nonprofit Policy News
• The Legislature has Left the Building, Pawlenty’s Poised to Make Cuts-What’s a Nonprofit to Do? from Philanthropy Potluck

This Week’s Harvest

• The Cohen Report: Finding Nonprofits in President Obama’s FY2010 Budget
• Philanthropists Set Spending Deadlines from the Wall Street Journal
• New to the Nonprofit Sector? Here’s a BRIEF Overview from Nonprofit Leadership 601
  
• Survival Strategies for the Arts from Blue Avocado