There has been (and will continue to be) a lot of discussion about how to address our state’s $4.8 billion budget gap for the upcoming biennium (2010-2011).
Our goal is to share thoughtful analysis on the budget, the proposed cuts, and what it means for everyday Minnesotans on this blog and over twitter (a great big thank you to @tomsheck, MPR’s Political Reporter for live tweeting the press conference). We will try to bring you the highlights, with an eye on how these changes will impact Minnesota’s nonprofit organizations and those they serve.
Recommended Reading
Governor Pawlenty’s Proposal
Yesterday the Governor released his 2010-2011 budget proposal. All of the information is available at the Minnesota State Budget website. State budgets are incredibly complex, and we are still trying to make sense of it.
However, there are some overarching principles, goals, and recommendations that we can unpack.
Budget Principles
•
- Balance the budget (this is mandated by our state Constitution)
- Fund priorities in order of importance
- Strategically position Minnesota for success in a changing world
- Enhance and expand pay for performance
- Don’t increase burdens by raising taxes
Financial Goals
- $250 million in budget reserves to address additional economic risk
- $350 million in cash flow account
- Understate potential level of federal fiscal assistance until finalized
- Improve structural budget – reduce 2012-13 budget gap by nearly half
As the slide illustrates, in order to achieve his goals, he proposes a series of cuts and cost saving measures. (Please note that these are screen shots and the presentation can be downloaded here.)

Budget Assumptions
All budgets have a set of assumptions. Minnesota Budget Bites unpacks some of the Governor’s underlying assumptions:
- He assumes Minnesota will get $920 million in federal stimulus relief (this is just a placeholder amount for now).
- He reduces the FY 2010-11 deficit by $1.3 billion by shifting K-12 education payments into the future.
- He raises close to $1 billion upfront by selling bonds secured with our tobacco lawsuit revenues.
Budget Priorities
- Enhance Minnesota’s job climate
- Improve K-12 education
- Protect state public safety programs
- Maintain military and veterans programs
- Increase government reform and accountability
Budget Cuts
The budget calls for $2,368 million in permanent spending cuts (a 2.2% spending cut). These cuts include:
- Changing eligibility standards for MinnesotaCare, which means that “84,000 people will lose health care eligibility over the next two years.” These changes include:
- Only those at 100% of the federal poverty level qualify for Medical Assistance (a family of four living on $21,200)
- Adults without children are no longer eligible for MinnesotaCare
- Cuts in state reimbursement to hospital and long-term care providers
- $151 million to the University of Minnesota (you can read their response here)
- $245 million in Local Government Aid
- $125 million in County Program Aid
- 5% cut in state agencies
All of these cuts will impact nonprofits. The changes in health care eligibility, a decrease in reimbursements, and cuts to local and county governments will affect health and human service organizations precisely at a time when need is growing and donations and foundation support is lagging.
These budget cuts, while not surprising, will force nonprofits to make hard choices.
Other Recommendations
- Borrowing $153 million from the Health Care Access Fund. It often runs a surplus and the state has used these funds to balance the budget in the past.
- Merge the Health Care Access Fund with the General Fund.
- Sell half of bonds from the state’s tobacco settlement
- Freeze wages
- K-12 payment shifts, totaling $1,294 million.
- This means deferring state reimbursements to school districts to the following year, known as the “holdback.” The current holdback is 10%, under Pawlenty’s budget it would be 20%.
These additional recommendations are primarily one-time solutions that will balance the budget for the moment, but not address the underlying structural problem – Minnesota has a flawed business model.