Nonprofit Harvest

Assisting nonprofits gather financial management resources that will help them build sustainable futures.

January 22, 2010

New Year, New You?

It’s a new year, a new decade, time to turn over a new leaf. Like many of you, I have New Year’s resolutions to get my life (and notoriously messy office) in better shape.

Many nonprofit and social enterprise bloggers have the same idea.  My favorite was Nell Edgington’s ideas about Social Impact Finance:

It’s a new year and a new decade, and both hold tremendous promise for creating real social change.  And key to significant social change is a fundamental restructuring of how we finance that change.  I think (hope) that in the next decade we will see the emergence of a new Social Impact Finance.  And I imagine it will look something like this…

  • Nonprofits Understand the Power of Finance. Nonprofit organizations understand and become successful at financing their overall operations, instead of fundraising for them.  And they begin to think bigger about their work, the overall outcomes they are trying to achieve and how finance fits into that (The GiveWell blog did a great series on the “Room for More Funding Question.”)

Another one of her predictions, Individual Donors Become a Powerhouse, echoes Kate’s post, The Year For “Right-Sized” Donations and the outpouring of support we have seen in response to the tragic earthquake in Haiti.

(For more on Haiti, I suggest visiting Philanthropy.com and PhilanTopic, which have done a great job covering this story from a nonprofit and philanthropic perspective.)

2010, The Year of the Board?

Is 2010 the year of the board?  Two blogs I read regularly are focusing on  governance to start the new year:

Are you looking for ways to help your board of directors take their leadership to the next level? Check out our webinar Financial Clarity for Nonprofit Boards next Friday, January 29th at 2pm CT (3pm EST). This training is a great way to prepare boards to assess and pursue new financial strategies, as well as shore up their understanding of nonprofit financial reports, terminology, and responsibilities.

We offer a range of financial trainings throughout the year.  They are an easy and affordable way to enhance your nonprofit’s financial management. For more information you can visit our website or sign up to receive training updates.

New Year, New Rules

We know there’s a new 990. Since organizations operate with different fiscal years (our Fiscal New Year is also April Fool’s Day) how do you know which form to use? Not-For-Profit Accounting has a short explanation to help you:

When do we file the new 990? Read below or click here for a PDF of a general overview of the instructions.

Calendar year – Use the 2008 Form 990 to report on the 2008 calendar year accounting period. A calendar year accounting period begins on January 1 and ends on December 31.

Fiscal year – If the organization has established a fiscal year accounting period, use the 2008 Form 990 to report on the organization’s fiscal year that began in 2008 and ended 12 months later. A fiscal year accounting period should normally coincide with the natural operating cycle of the organization. Be certain to indicate in the heading of Form 990 the date the organization’s fiscal year began in 2008 and the date the fiscal year ended in 2009.

The Nitty Gritty

There have been many useful guides to the new 990. Here are some of my favorites:

In case you want to go directly to the source, these are updates and resources from the IRS:

This is also a good time to review the Top 5 Compliance Problems for 501(c)(3) Organizations.

For folks interested in taking their analysis to the next level, check out The Door Has Opened: New Form 990 Creates Strategic Opportunities and Risks for Nonprofit Organizations.

Nonprofit Harvest

November 23, 2009

What I’m Thankful For - Strategic Collaboration

Tomorrow I’m going home for Thanksgiving, and I’m looking forward to seeing friends and family for the first time in a while.  I live half a country away, so I don’t get home as often as I would like.

I think it’s interesting, and timely, that in the last few weeks both my original and adopted hometowns blew me away by their community and collaborative spirit.

Partnerships That Produce Results

First, Buffalo, NY took full advantage of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition coming to town, using the opportunity to transform an entire neighborhood and illustrate the importance of green building practices, such as deconstruction.

Then Minnesotans donated more than $14 million dollars to 3,141 nonprofit organizations in 24 hours, setting a national record. That is certainly above average.

Wow.

Neither effort would have been possible without significant community support - in the form of 5,000 volunteers and 38,778 donors, respectively - as well as the work of countless organizations behind the the scenes and some public-private partnerships.

There is no reaction except to be humbled. But there are lessons that we can learn for projects large and small.

Let’s Collaborate

Right now, everyone who wants to improve the nonprofit sector is emphasizing collaboration.  Certainly in some instances the results are impressive.  But successful partnerships take a lot of work and trust.

There is no one size fits all model. Collaborations range from joining forces on a project to combining backroom operations to a full merger.  Advantages include increasing impact or taking advantage of unique skill sets, such as in these examples, and minimizing costs.  Challenges include letting go of control, managing the needs of diverse stakeholders, and confusion around roles and responsibilities.

GiveMN as an Example

The GiveMN Give to the Max Day effort was incredibly successful in promoting individual giving, engaging new donors, increasing online donations, and getting significant amounts of cash into the hands of nonprofit organizations.

However, there was also confusion around some details, especially the matching funds. Regardless of how the uncertainty happened, it underscores the importance of clear communications among stakeholders - in this case that includes the 3,141 nonprofits, 38,778 donors, and the project partners.  Everyone needs to be on the same page about project goals and outcomes.

Beyond illustrating the widespread community support for Minnesota’s nonprofit sector, GiveMN also shows that nonprofits and their supporters can effectively use social media and other online tools to leverage their networks to take action.  There was an earned media blitz from the partners, but organizations and individuals took advantage of email, facebook, and twitter to get the word out.  The very nature of social media is collaborative.

What are your stories of collaboration? What lessons have you learned from those experiences?

Case Studies

Tools and Resources

Scenario Planning

The McKinsey Quarterly recently wrote an article about the advantages (and some potential pitfalls) of scenario planning.  At Nonprofits Assistance Fund, we love scenario planning for the reasons laid out in McKinsey Quarterly:

Scenarios are a powerful tool in the strategist’s armory. They are particularly useful in developing strategies to navigate the kinds of extreme events we have recently seen in the world economy. Scenarios enable the strategist to steer a course between the false certainty of a single forecast and the confused paralysis that often strike in troubled times.

What’s in your Planning Toolbox?

Here are some resources that can help you craft your own scenarios.

You can also read Kate’s post on this topic, What H1N1 Taught Me About Contingency Planning.

November 13, 2009

What’s Wrong With This Picture?

Filed under: Economy, Foundations, News, Philanthropy — ashley @ 3:21 pm

It’s that time of year, when the Wall Street Journal and New York Times devote entire sections to philanthropy, charitable giving, and nonprofits.

The Wall Street Journal Makes It Personal

Why is management advice to the philanthropic sector filed under personal finance?

wsj_philanthropy4.jpg

This section includes commentary about foundation payout rates, general operating support, social enterprise, public-private partnerships, and corporate philanthropy - not personal finance. There is a related blog post on how financial advisers can help their clients maintain their charitable giving in a recession, but it’s not part of the special section.

At least the New York Times section on Giving is part of their US coverage.

nyt33.jpg

Why It Matters

This might seem off topic, but when business leaders (and their publications) tell nonprofits how to behave, how to improve, how to be more efficient and effective, while also treating us as an afterthought, that’s a problem.  It underscore how little time and energy they spend thinking about the challenges - and possible solutions - for our sector.

And I think it also explains why often the rallying cry is “be more like business,” even when that doesn’t make sense.

Philanthropic Investments

If you read about Goldman Sach’s Foundation’s unusual investment strategies, you might be curious about “traditional” investments.  The ideas of prudence and risk management - because the funds are intended to benefit the community - underscore most philanthropic investment strategies.

In her blog post from last year, Jittery About Investments, Kate lays out some fundamental guidelines for nonprofits:

  • Time Horizon – Funds that may be needed within a few months must be invested in highly liquid, safe investments. This is the most common type of investment fund for most nonprofits, composed of operating funds and reserves. In order to be assured that the funds will be available as needed, the investment choice must be readily available.
  • Risk Tolerance – One of the fundamentals of investing is the balance of risk versus return. Investments with a higher return almost always also come with higher risk. The key question for nonprofit leaders and boards is to understand how much risk is involved and to decide if they can accept the risk. As an example, if the funds to be invested represent the balance of a large program grant that will be spent over the next year, then the organization can’t afford to risk the loss of any of the funds. A permanent endowment fund, on the other hand, is usually invested in a diverse portfolio that includes more risk in return for a higher long-term return.
  • Responsibility – The nonprofit’s board of directors is responsible for overseeing this balance of risk and return for the health of the organization and any legal requirements. In order to fulfill this responsibility the board must act as prudent and loyal stewards of the organization’s assets.

Here are some additional resources:

Foundations can also use mission-related investments and program-related investments as part of their portfolio. Learn more about MRIs and PRIs:

Nonprofit Harvest

June 12, 2009

Looking Forward by Looking Back

Charitable Giving: Glass Half Empty or Hall Full?

This week, Giving USA released their report on 2008 giving.  As nonprofits can attest, it was a rough year.  According to the study, total giving decreased by 5.7%, with donations down across the board.

  • Individual giving: -6.3 percent
  • Foundation grantmaking: -0.8 percent
  • Corporate giving: -8 percent
  • Charitable bequests: -6.4 percent
  • Two-thirds of public charities experienced a decline in donations.

However, even in the worst economic climate since the Great Depression, charitable giving exceeded $300 billion.

Over at Tactical Philanthropy, Sean does some excellent analysis in his post How Much Did Americans Really Give in 2008?

So what’s the take away? I would say that the best way to think about charitable giving in 2008 is that it contracted sharply, but that the contraction was less than many people feared and the total amount given was within the range of the level of giving seen over the past few years. Giving as a percentage of GDP was 2.2%, within the normal range and very close to the 2.3% of GDP that was given in 2007…

Charitable giving behaved more or less as it normally does when the economy sours. This is, by most measures, the worst recession in a very long time and so we’re seeing charitable giving get hit. But it is only declining in line with the way it normally behaves.

As a reminder, if this recession is similar to other economic downturns, it will take the philanthropic/nonprofit sector longer to recover than the rest of the economy.  The Giving USA authors commented in a discussion hosted by the Chronicle of Philanthropy that this recession resembles the one in1974 , when took three years for giving to rebound.  However, they cautioned against assuming that this would be an accurate guide, noting the changes in the world and the nonprofit sector.

Related Coverage

Other Giving Reports

What’s a nonprofit to do? Start contingency planning

During the Giving USA chat, someone brought up the question of budgeting amidst so much uncertainty:

Question from Hazel, animal charity: How can one do any financial planning or construct a budget for the coming year when it may even be worse than last year and no one knows whom we can depend on?

Nancy Raybin:  Agree on different scenarios, e.g. economy gets worse by 10 percent, economy levels; economy gets better by 10 percent. Make some hypotheses about the impact of different scenarios on your animal charity’s activities and what donors are likely to do. Then prepare different budgets for each scenario. Clearly, you know best how animal lovers respond in these times. You must also have a number of donors on whom you can depend. Focus on those.

Sometimes it feels like I’m beating the scenario planning drum all time, but it really is the best advice we can give to help nonprofits plan and adapt in these uncertain times. Download and use our tools to get started.

This Week’s Harvest