Nonprofit Harvest

Stimulus Update

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, commonly called the Stimulus), includes significant funding for nonprofit organizations.  However, assessing whether or not you should apply, and how to do so, can be a daunting task.  Especially given the timetable for submissions and reporting.

Before you apply for any federal funding, I encourage you to read these words of caution and consider whether or not your organization has the infrastructure and administrative capacity for a federal grant.

Jim Schowalter, Minnesota’s state budget director, also offers a few important caveats about the available funds, according to MCF’s Philanthropy Potluck blog:

The amount of stimulus money flowing to Minnesota is equal to 8.2 percent of our state budget; however, our state is facing a 15 percent budget deficit.  This stimulus funding provides a one- or two-year bump to hopefully get us through the recession, but it is not enough to resolve our budget deficit.

While the dollars involved are many, they are not significant enough to create new areas of funding or expand programming, and may not even be enough to stave off cuts to balance our state’s budget.  Much of the money will be distributed using existing infrastructure and pipelines and will go to backfill gaps created by budget shortfalls.

General Resources

• Bulletin on How Nonprofits Can Apply for Stimulus Package Funding from Giving USA and the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University
• What Do Nonprofits Need to Know About the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act? 
• National Council of Nonprofits Special Reports on Economic Stimulus & Recovery

Minnesota Resources

• Best ARRA Funding Resources – Minnesota from the Foundation Center
• Overview of the Recovery Act from the Minnesota Management & Budget Agency
  
• 2009 Recovery Act Resources for Nonprofits from MCN

New 990 Resources

The IRS has an excellent Resource Library to help nonprofits maintain their tax exempt status, file reports, and meet other requirements.  They recently produced a new mini course to help nonprofits file the 990.

As a reminder, MCN has video training that helps organizations understand the changes to the 990 and Not-For-Profit Accounting can help answer your questions.

This Week’s Harvest

• Surveys: Few NP Mergers And Ready Credit
• Nonprofit Groups in 19 States Report Late Government Payments
• The Funder is Not the Program
• More Than a Third of Family Foundations Are Either Uncertain About Lifespan or Expect to Spend Down

Tuesday’s budget announcement was just the beginning:

The budget debate is just beginning, and Governor Pawlenty said his proposal will need some adjustments in the coming weeks to reflect new financial information.

One change will come when Minnesota learns the amount of its share of the federal economic stimulus bill. Another will come next month, when finance officials update the state economic forecast, which is expected to project an even larger budget deficit.

Deferring Revenue and One-Time Solutions

The Governor proposed a number of one-time solutions which will reduce our budget for the upcoming biennium, but will not address the underlying problems that impact our state.

The impact of these decisions have been addressed more eloquently by others (here, here, here, and here). Concerns about their feasibility can be found here and here.

What strikes me is that we have a problem with our business model. Our expenses outweigh our income.

To fix that problem, we must both cut spending and increase revenue. As D.J. Leary writes in his reaction to the budget, we have a structural problem:

This governor has faced two multi-billion dollar budgetary shortfalls since first being elected in 2002 and he still doesn’t appear to have grasped the reality that Minnesota has a structural defect in its overall fiscal configuration.  Minnesota simply has too narrow an income stream to provide government services at the level its people want and need.  The governor’s budget is nothing more than state government’s version of Three-card Monte.

The Governor is proposing some ways to generate revenue – such as additional fees for service – but has taken off the table one way to do this.  “Don’t increase burdens by raising taxes” was one of the Governor’s underlying principles when crafting this budget.

Taxes are a loaded topic.  Deciding to raise taxes, especially in the midst of a recession, is not easy. What concerns me is that the Governor is not willing to consider this revenue stream.

As an example, can you imagine a nonprofit being unwilling to consider an earned income venture or an individual giving campaign when trying to bridge a 14% funding gap? Or an organization that solved this through problem a large one-time grant, using restricted funds for another purpose, and deferring payments to vendors to the next fiscal year.

Unconvinced? Mr. Leary and I are not alone.

Minnesota Budget Trends Study Commission

Minnesota Budget Trends Study Commission was established at the end of the 2007 session to analyze the factors that were contributing to our state’s ongoing budget volatility.  In particular, they looked at the implications of our shifting demographics:

The State Budget Trends Study Commission is established for the purpose of completing a study of the implications of state demographic trends for future state budget conditions, including both expected revenue collections and spending for state government services and local services supported by state revenues.

On January 12, they released a report that outlined some of the challenges facing the “long-term stability of the state budget.” Their findings included, but were not limited to (emphasis mine):

• Despite continuing to rank high among many key social and economic indicators, Minnesota’s economy has underperformed recently relative to the nation.
• Demographic and economic factors will lead to lower growth of state revenues over the next 25 years.
• Minnesota has a long-term structural budget problem, with long term expenditure growth likely to outpace revenue growth.
• Minnesota’s general fund tax base has grown more volatile in the past decade.

Coverage on the report:

• Report: Minn. budget problems need long-term fix from the AP (via the Star Tribune)
• Minnesota budget trends study says changing demographics require revised state financial system from MinnPost’s Joe Kimball
• Report from Minnesota Budget Trends Study Commission from Jerry Zhao of the Humphrey Institute
• A commission with some common sense ideas from Minnesota Budget Bites

How do we Fix the Problem?

The first step to any solution is acknowledging that there is a problem.

We knew that news would not be promising. We were warned that the state budget deficit for the next two years could be as high as 6 billion dollars.

So, what are the numbers?

Although the numbers are not as bad as some projections, they are ugly.  What a weird reaction to be oddly relieved that the gap is “only 5.2 billion.”

Minnesota Budget Bites has a great breakdown of the numbers:

• For the current biennium (FY 2008-09, which ends June 30, 2009) the deficit is $426 million (that’s about half the size of the deficit we already closed during the 2008 Legislative Session).
• For the next biennium (FY 2010-11) the deficit is $4.8 billion (add another $650 million for inflation).  That deficit amounts to about 13% of our budget. That’s a lot. State Economist Tom Stinson says this recession is expected to last 24 months – which would be the longest recession on record.
• For the biennium after that (FY 2012-13) the planning estimate predicts a $4.6 billion deficit (add another $1.5 billion for inflation).

By the way, in case you are confused by the $5.2 billion deficit announced in the media – that adds the FY 2008-09 and FY 2010-11 deficits together.

What people are saying

There is, and will continue to be, a lot of conversation on this issue. A great place to go for up to date information is the Budget Bites blog from the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits.

• Deficits: $426 million now, $4.8 billion soon and $4.6 billion later 

• Predictions of a $4 billion state budget deficit

Here are some additional news stories:

• Officials react to Minnesota’s dire deficit projection

• Budget deficit: Pawlenty remains oppposed to tax increases

• Minnesota’s red ink: $5.2 billion; Pawlenty seeks 10% spending cuts

• As Minnesota reels from a record deficit, leaders offer no specifics on recovery

• Op-Ed from Dane Smith (Executive Director of Growth & Justice)

• Minnesota Revenue Loss Pushes State $5.5 Billion in the Red

• Session of a thousand cuts: Thursday’s budget forecast sure to force painful decisions

• Looming Minnesota deficit offers chance to innovate

You can also visit the Minnesota Management & Budget website to see the state’s financial information, the November forecast, and get up to date on budget planning for FY 2010-2011.

What are our options?

The impact will be huge and felt across the state, in every community and every sector.  This figure represents 14% of the state budget.  Minnesota’s constitution requires a balanced budget, so tough choices will have to be made.

Where do we start?

• Budget Bites calls our attention to an article from 2001, Budget Cuts vs. Tax Increases at the State Level: Is One More Counter-Productive than the Other During a Recession? from the Center for Budget Policy and Priorities.

• A more recent article from CPBB outlines proposed budget cuts that would disproportionally impact those most vulnerable.

• Scott Russell at MinnPost weighs the relative merits of cutting rates or eligibility for health and human service organizations.

• Post your ideas and suggestions at Minnesota 2010 and elsewhere.

If you tweet or use delicious, I suggest tagging items as mnbudget. Let’s aggregate our ideas!

(My favorite tweet on this topic was from @dbrauer, who writes for MinnPost: “Seriously, we are going to need MPR’s budget challenge for this deficit thing. Stories today made clear cuts alone won’t do it.” For a bit of levity, check out the Budget Hero.)